The reason I started writing this blog was because the ECA website was undergoing a rebuild and now that this has been finished and can be found at www.curlingengland.com there will be no more reports on this blog.
For other curling stories I will still be writing on http://toothyscurlingtales.blogspot.co.uk/
Thanks for reading
ENGLISH CURLING ASSOCIATION
News and views on curling in England
Tuesday, 4 February 2014
Monday, 3 February 2014
ECA MIXED DOUBLES DECIDED
A disappointingly low entry of 4 teams took part in this year’s English Mixed Doubles Championship at Fenton’s Rink. This required a double round robin and a final to decide the winners, though a final would not be necessary if one team remained undefeated all weekend.
Play began with two games on the Friday evening, followed by 3 on Saturday and one planned for Sunday followed by the final. In the end, the last round robin games were not necessary as the top 2 teams by that time were clearly identified and so the final took place earlier than programmed.
As with all ECA Championships there were to be no tie-breakers played (a stance that the World Curling Federation is still trying to implement in all of its Championships) and the ranking of teams at the end of the round – robin would be based upon firstly, games won and then the results between any tied teams and then, if necessary, by each team’s Draw Shot Challenge score.
This means that before every game the teams each play a Last Stone Draw which determines which team has the choice of going first or second in the first end. At the end of the round-robin the Last Stone Draws for each team are totalled and averaged (after the removal of the worst individual LSD). This average (the Draw Shot Challenge) then determines ranking if necessary. This would be an important element in this Mixed Doubles Championship.
Last year’s runners-up, Alan MacDougall and Lana Watson (M/W )headed the entry with challenges from Lorna Rettig / Ben Fowler (R/F), who had played together as England in the New Zealand Winter Games last summer, Bryan Zachary / Angharad Ward (Z/W) and John Brown / Jean Robinson (B/R). To save space I will use the abbreviations above in this report!!
When the teams went to bed on Friday night the scoreboard showed that M/W led the way on 2 wins followed by R/F and Z/W on 1 in and 1 loss and B/R on 2 losses. The best score of the night was Z/W’s 13-1 defeat of B/R while other games were on average decided by 4 or 5 shots over the 8 ends.
The first session on Saturday opened the competition up with Z/W defeating M/W meaning that a final would now be necessary as there were no undefeated teams left. In the second session R/F then defeated Z/W while that result was reversed in the second game between the two teams leaving the situation at the end of Saturday as M/W on 4 wins, Z/W and R/F on 3 wins and B/R on 0 wins.
Unfortunately, the Brown / Robinson pair now had to withdraw from the competition owing to a medical issue and thus Z/W were given a walkover in the final game of the round robin, putting them on 4 wins and meaning that R/F would therefore need to defeat M/W in their last game to reach 4 wins and thus be equal with the other two teams.
At this point it became clear that each of the three team’s possible DSC score would be vital as it would decide the ranking of the three and identify the top 2 that would go to the final. Even if R/F defeated M/W they would be ranked behind them on DSC and the current DSCs would mean that they would also be ranked behind Z/W – so would the game between R/F and M/W actually be meaningful?
The issue would be decided before the last round robin game would start as all three teams would have a chance to modify their DSC with their last LSD. Even though Z/W were not playing they had to undertake the LSD for the game – a bad LSD for them and a good one for R/F could reverse their possible ranking and mean that R/F had to play M/W to see if they could beat them, get 4 wins and thus finish 2nd.
So it was a tense situation on the Sunday morning as Angharad threw her LSD for Z/W as their continued participation in the competition could be affected by it. However, cool as a cucumber she drew it to 13 cms and sealed the place in the final as, no matter what LSD the R/F duo threw, they could not overtake Z/W to qualify. So the last round robin session was cancelled and it was straight on to the final.
This game went down to the last stone when an attempt by Alan MacDougall to score a one to tie the scores failed, but only after a measure, and Bryan Zachary and Angharad Ward were crowned English Mixed Doubles Champions, the prizes being presented by Angharad’s mother, Rosaleen Boardman, the Vice-President of the ECA.
This completes an amazing feat for Angharad – when she competes for England at the World Mixed Doubles in Dumfries she will have played at International level for England at Junior Women, Women, Mixed and Mixed Doubles (not forgetting GB at Youth Olympic level) – and all while still in her teens – mind you she will have to wait 31 years to complete the Grand Slam by playing at Senor Women level as well!!
Thursday, 16 January 2014
4 NATIONS PREVIEW
This weekend (18th / 19th January) sees the 4 Nations weekend take place at Lanarkshire Ice Rink, Hamilton, hosted by the Irish Curling Association.
England will be hoping to go one better than last year when they defeated the Scottish men and Ireland (by one shot) but lost heavily to the Scottish women and Wales.
The English teams going out to do battle are as follows:
England will be hoping to go one better than last year when they defeated the Scottish men and Ireland (by one shot) but lost heavily to the Scottish women and Wales.
The English teams going out to do battle are as follows:
|0900||Wales||Mixed||Tommy Campbell||Susan Young||Graham Stanley||Sandra Moorcroft|
|Wales||Mixed||Fiona Hawker||Phil Barton||Jean Robinson||Jim Marmont|
|Scotland||Men||John Brown||Nigel Patrick||Jonathan Havercroft||Stuart Brand|
|Scotland||Men||John Summers||Charles Jackson||Alastair Fyfe||Ross Barr|
|1200||Scotland||Men||John Summers||Charles Jackson||Stuart Brand||John Maxwell|
|Scotland||Men||Michael Sutherland||Nigel Patrick||Alastair Fyfe||Ian Curle|
|Scotland||Ladies||Fiona Hawker||Susan Young||Jessica Skelton||Alison Barr|
|1500||Ireland||Mixed||John Brown||Jean Robinson||Thomas Hume||Jessica Skelton|
|Ireland||Mixed||Phil Barton||Sandra Moorcroft||Graham Stanley||Alison Barr|
|0900||Wales||Men||Tommy Campbell||Jonathan Havercroft||Ross Barr||Jim Marmont|
|Wales||Ladies||Jean Robinson||Susan Young||Sandra Moorcroft||Jackie Orr|
|Scotland||Men||Michael Sutherland||Phil Barton||John Maxwell||Ian Curle|
|1130||Scotland||Men||Nigel Patrick||Jonathan Havercroft||Ross Barr||John Maxwell|
|Scotland||Men||Tommy Campbell||John Summers||Stuart Brand||Thomas Hume|
|Scotland||Men||Michael Sutherland||Charles Jackson||Graham Stanley||Ian Curle|
|Scotland||Ladies||Fiona Hawker||Susan Young||Jackie Orr||Alison Barr|
|1400||Ireland||Men||John Brown||Alastair Fyfe||Thomas Hume||Jim Marmont|
|Ireland||Ladies||Fiona Hawker||Jean Robinson||Alison Barr||Sandra Moorcroft|
Tuesday, 10 December 2013
SHARP WINS SENIORS AT LAST
John Sharp had been trying for three years to win the Senior Men’s Championship and each time he had been thwarted, principally by Michael Sutherland, and so when Michael retired at the end of last season it must have seemed to John that now was his time to take over as England’s representative on the World stage. He recruited Tommy Campbell from the Sutherland team and brought in new ‘young’ blood in the shape of Keith Wilson to join Alastair Fyfe and Mike Robinson. The other two in the reigning champion team, John Summers and Charles Jackson, formed a new team with ex-champion Phil Barton and new boy David Sillito and travelled South to Fenton’s at the beginning of the December in unseasonably mild weather, at least after they had managed to escape the storms hitting Scotland.
With just two entries it was a best-of-5 rubber to decide the winners. With both skips called John, and with initials JS, I will call them by their surname I think for the rest of this piece. Sharp started off winning the hammer with an LSD of 7.6cms and used that advantage to take 2 at the first end, quickly followed by a couple of stolen singles before Summers got on the board with a 1 at the 4th. Summers then stole a 1 and a 2 to peel the game 4-4 after 6 but a change of tactic by Sharp brought him a 5 and the game ended at 9-4 to Sharp.
Game 2 began with neither skip getting a stone in the house for the LSD but a tossed coin gave Sharp the hammer again. This time, however, he was unable to use it and lost 2, though he quickly replied with a 4 at the second end before Summers scored 3 at the 3rd to lead 5-4. This looked likely to be a high scoring game but 3 ends later they had only advanced to 6-6. Sharp blanked the 7th and then took 1 at the 8th to win 7-6 and take a 2 games to 0 advantage.
Game 3 and at least both skips got their LSD in the house and Summers, with a distance of 66.8cms, took the hammer which he then used to his advantage to score 2 at the first end. An immediate riposte from Sharp equalled the score and he then forged ahead with 2 stolen singles only for Summer to reply with 2 singles of his own and yet again it was all square, 6-6, after 6 ends. When Sharp took a 2 at the 7th it seemed that the title was nearly his but a total miss with his last stone gifted Summers a 3 and the victory and we all had to return on Sunday for more games.
The 4th game was the most one sided of the weekend though it started off close with the score reaching 3-3 after 4 ends. With the hammer, Summers then took 2 at the 5th and then further 2s for him at the 6th and 7th ends saw hands shaken early at 9-3 for Summers and all to play for in the decider.
Apart from Sharp’s LSD of 7.6cms in the first game the standard of drawing for this crucial part of the game had been pretty low but, in a taste of what was to come, in the 5th game Sharp drew to 29.2cms to be followed by Summers who drew to 29.3cms! So close to needing another toss of the coin to decide the hammer. In this game Summers had the upper hand for much of the time – Sharp only took a single with the hammer at the first end and Summers then went 3-1 up after 3, and then 5-2 up after 5 and looked pretty much in control until a disastrous 6th end saw Sharp take a 6 (and it should have been 7) to take an 8-5 lead.
In the 7th end there were 5 Sharp stones in the house and it definitely looked like game over until Summers played a great hit and roll to steal 1 and send the game into a tense last end – so tense in fact that the umpire was called to adjudicate when it was realised that Phil Barton had thrown 3 stones! The call there was that Summers would only play 1 stone when it came to his turn, but in reality by that time the game was lost, an ambitious double raise was never really on and Sharp won by 8-6 to earn the right to travel all the way to Dumfries in Scotland to play in the World Senior Men’s Championship in April.
They will be joined there by a Women’s team consisting of Jean Robinson, Susan Young, Judith Dixon and Debbie Higgins with a 5th player still to be confirmed.
Friday, 6 December 2013
England’s Ladies Win European Bronze Medal
England’s ladies team of Anna Fowler (22) (skip), Hetty Garnier (18), Lauren Pearce (21), Naomi Robinson (19) and Lucy Sparks (17) came back from the European B Group Championships in Stavanger, Norway at the end of November with a bronze medal. This was a fantastic achievement for such a young team and bodes well for the future if they can stay together through the University years and beyond.
It was a tough week punctuated by illness for a couple of the players who were also not used to playing 10-end games of such frequency. The only previous time they had played 10 ends was in the English Championships where they had 5 games to play before they won it, coming from 2 games down to win 3-2 overall.
There were 10 teams in the B Group which meant 9 round-robin games over 5 days and they got off to the best possible start by scoring a 5 at the first end against the newly promoted Slovenia, eventually winning 15-3 after 6 ends. So that was a gentle introduction to the competition and the next game against Belarus, also promoted from the C Group, started in a similar fashion with England 6-0 up after 2 ends, before eventually winning 10-4 in 7 ends.
Game 3 against Poland was the first big challenge as the Poles, skipped by Elzbieta Ran had beaten England in the last 2 Europeans and this time it looked like a similar thing happening. England were never in front in the game, having to come from behind to draw level 3 times, until the last end when they stole a 2 to win 7-5 and we started to believe that something special could happen.
It was Turkey in game 4 and while we had beaten them in the last 2 Europeans, it had been mighty close in Karlstad. This was another close game initially but 3 stolen ends in the middle of the game to give Turkey a 6-2 lead proved decisive as our unbeaten record went, courtesy of a 7-4 defeat. Things were now tight at the top of the table as after 4 games Finland, Estonia, Turkey and England had all won 3 out of 4 games.
Over the years Austria have proved formidable opponents for England and we had only beaten them 3 times in 14 attempts, the last being back in 2006 in Basel. Constanze Hummelt has moved up to skip this year for them and with a 2-2 record after 4 games they were well in the mix. This game was a thriller and Hetty and Anna kept the best to the end. Fortunes ebbed to and fro and Austria appeared to have made a breakthrough when they stole a single at the 7th end to go into a 6-4 lead. But England came back with a 2 to level it after 8 before Austria took 1 at the 9th to lead 7-6 though England had the hammer.
The last end looked like Austria’s with stones around the button until Hetty played two dead draws to nudge Austria out of shot position. Time was also counting down and though it was never going to be a decisive factor, it did mean that when Anna came to play her last stone, after an Austrian saver had cut us done to lying just 1, she needed time to compose herself to play a delicate tee+ weight tap to get a second stone into the clutch that were lying within the 4 foot. To great roars from the travelling England support of 3, or maybe 4 by that time, she made a great shot under extreme pressure to collect 2 and the victory by 8-6. Meanwhile Turkey had lost to Finland and we were down to 3 teams tying for the lead.
Into game 6 and it was Spain skipped by the big-hitting Irantzu Garcia who, in spite of her youth, has a lot of experience in World level competition at Mixed, Mixed Doubles and Ladies Championships and she is well known to the England team as they have played against each other at Juniors for a number of years. This game started off slowly with 2 blank ends before a 1 and 2 for England gave them an early lead. Some careless play at the 5th end and Spain got 2 back again but a 2 at the 6th and a 5-2 lead seemed to have settled England. However, 2 ends later and it was 5-5 and the spectators were starting to sense that this game might be running away from England until a 2 at the 9th settled the nerves before we ran them out of stones at the 10th – but it had been mighty close again.
So that had been a manic Monday with those 2 last stone thrillers and the girls were feeling the effect of playing 10 end games on keen ice where the sweeping was critical to dragging that extra foot or two out of a draw. That was 4 games in a row that had been nerve-janglers all the way.
Hungary were relegated last year from the A group and while they were still skipped by Ildiko Szekeres, there were a couple of changes in the team and they were struggling to get the wins on the board, having only won 2 out of the 6 played. Another team against whom England have a poor record, having never beaten them in 4 previous encounters, but as in the previous 4 games this week, this one went to the very end. Hungary led 3-1 at half time, having just stolen a single but the fighting spirit of this England team saw them edge in front by 4-3 after 7 ends. Hungary levelled it in the 8th and then stole a crucial 2 in the 9th before running us out of stones in the 10th.
The good thing from our point of view in this session was that Estonia also lost and so, although Finland were now clear in front with 6 wins, England were level on 5 wins with Estonia and still one win ahead of Turkey on 4. Meanwhile Spain were slipping into the danger zone with only 2 wins, the same as a resurgent Poland, (who after 5 straight losses had won 2 in a row) and Slovenia, who had beaten both Spain and Hungary as they fought to put behind them that first game drubbing by England and further big losses to Finland by 12-2 and Estonia by 13-1. In the end that was as far as they would get and they ended up back in Group C for next season along, surprisingly, with Spain who failed to win any of their last 4 games.
Two games to go then for England, and against the top 2 teams - quite a challenge and while they were actually now guaranteed at least a tie-breaker, one more win would get them over that hurdle if other results went their way. So it was important to try and beat Estonia in the next game as they were possibly an easier team than Finland. Estonia are a country who England had the slight edge over having beaten them 3 times out of 5 over the years, but the games have been ever more closely fought as the years have gone by.
Not since the second game of the week against Belarus had England played fewer than 10 ends and this game continued that sequence.
This time the 5-2 lead at half-time was in favour of the Estonians who had out-thought Anna to take a 3 at the 4th end. This really was a game of two halves though and by the 9th end we had scored 4 shots without reply to lead 6-5, but in the tenth end, without the hammer, we were unable to get the stones in place for a chance of a steal, Estonia got their 2 and England lost by 6-7.
And so to game 9, the last of the round-robin and all sorts of permutations were possible – obviously if we beat Finland then we were into the play-offs, but if we lost there could be a nightmare scenario of having to play 2 tie-breakers to qualify, though other results could send us straight through without any. There was only one thing for it and that was to win against a Finnish team that had already qualified for the play-offs.
England had not beaten Finland since 2002 and had won only 5 out of 18 games between the two countries but by this time the girls were determined to get their hands on a medal and they produced a great performance against a country who were relegated from the A group last year. A storming start saw them take 2 shots in each of the first two ends and maintain that 4 shot lead (6-2) at half time. A further steal of one in the 6th and then an exchange of 2s and it was 9-4 for England after 8 – would Finland shake hands or carry on – they had nothing to lose and it was into a 9th end. For maybe only the second time in the week, the England girls looked a bit vulnerable and maybe they thought that they had the game won because suddenly Finland scored 3 shots at the 9th and it was now 9-7 – the game was still on. However England pulled themselves together and, with the spectators more nervous than the players, they held on and won by 10-7.
And that was the end of the first stage – 9 games played, 6 games won and 83 ends played, and 3rd place in the final round robin standings. Not only that but also Anna’s Draw Shot Challenge of 30.6cms average was nearly 10cms better than the next country, Estonia at 40.3cms and would have been 5th overall if she had been playing in the A Group!! A great performance which meant that they had had last stone at the first end in 7 of their games. In addition they never lost more than 3 at any end and they only lost two 3’s, while scoring three 4s and a 5.
Now they had to wait to see who they would play in the Page 3 / 4 game as Austria, Turkey and Hungary had tied for 4th place on 5 wins. The Draw Shot Challenge scores meant that Turkey would play Hungary in a tie-breaker, the winner of that game would play Austria and the winner of that second tie-breaker would be England’s opponents. In the tie-breakers Turkey beat Hungary 7-6, but then lost to Austria by 10-5 and so it was another chance for England to improve the record against the Alpine misses.
Austria had not lost a 3 at any end in any of the round-robin games but in this 3 / 4 play-off against England they lost 3! However, that fact does not adequately define England’s victory because after 7 ends it was 7-6 to Austria. Then the dam burst and a 3 at the 8th was followed by a 3 at the 9th and it was 12-7 for England and a place in the semi-final against Estonia. This was also the 100th win for an England ladies team in European and World Championships.
Still no medal was guaranteed but victory would mean gold or silver and a place in Group A for next season and a chance, if they won that final, to play-off against Germany for a place in the World Championship. Defeat by Estonia and it would be back to the bronze medal game – against Austria (again)!!
Estonia began the semi- final by blanking the first three ends and then scoring 5 shots in the next 3 ends. A single for England at the 7th was followed by another 2 for Estonia at the 8th and after scoring one at the 9th the English girls shook hands and prepared for their 12th game of the week and their third against Austria! England coach, John Sharp, reckoned that the Estonians missed nothing at all in the game, the best performance in the Group all week.
And so to game number 3 against Austria, and another close one, but this time, apart from after the first end, England were never down and from a 5-2 position at half time they kept their game together to win 7-5. Bronze medals – the first for the ladies team since Kirsty Balfour and her team won gold in Fussen in 2007 and the first for a team of English born and bred players, raised through the Junior ranks at Fenton’s Rink in Kent. For three of the team the next challenge is to qualify for the World Juniors at the European Junior Challenge in Finland in January and this performance in Norway must give them so much confidence for that competition.
Thursday, 14 November 2013
HISTORY OF THE ECA
The English Curling Association was formed in 1971. It is a full member of the European Curling Federation (until this body is disbanded in 2014) and the World Curling Federation and is also a member of British Curling, the organisation which manages Great Britain’s Olympic and Paralympic curling programmes.
The English Curling Association aims to support, promote and develop the sport of curling in England, to unite curlers throughout England in the brotherhood of curling, to regulate the affairs of its members and to represent its members on International Confederations. It also sends teams to major International competitions.
The Executive Council of the ECA includes representatives from all areas of the country though curling can only be played at one location in England, Fenton’s Rink, Dundale Farm, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, but the Association hopes that further venues will be found as a result of Britain’s participation in the Olympic Games.
History of English Curling
The sport of curling is more than 500 years old and its true origin is hidden in the mists of time, but it was in Scotland where it evolved over the centuries and also where the mother club of curling, The Royal Caledonian Curling Club was formed in 1838. The sport has of course evolved through the years and the latest change on how it is played was introduced in 1990 when the free guard zone rule was introduced. In 1998 the sport became a full medal sport at the Olympics.
Early records indicate that curling was first played in the North of England at the end of the 18th century with a bonspiel being recorded as having taken place in 1795 between England and the Border Counties of Scotland. In 1811 a few Scots curled on the New River, a canal in North London, attracting such a large crowd that the ice was in danger of breaking and they were obliged to stop playing. A similar thing happened in 1847 when 2 Scottish Members of Parliament played on the Serpentine in London.
The first club was founded in Leeds in 1820, followed by Liverpool in 1839 and by 1914 there were 37 clubs playing in the North of England. England’s most important contribution to 19th century curling was the invention of a means of making artificial ice. In 1877 a rink opened in Manchester and the World’s first curling match on artificial ice took place in March of that year. The rink soon closed but another was opened at Southport, Lancashire in 1879 and survived until 1890.
After the failure of Southport some curling was played at Prince’s Skating and Curling Club in London and then in 1910 the Manchester Ice Palace opened and curling was played there until 1962. Following the closure of Manchester, ice was found at Blackpool between 1965 and 1970, but there has been no regular curling in the North since then.
Meanwhile, in the South, Richmond Ice Rink featured curling between 1951 and 1980. Since then a number of ice rinks in and around London have been used for curling - Streatham, Peterborough, Chelmsford, Aldershot, and Alexandra Palace in North London where 2 International Bonspiels and the Triangular International weekend (Scotland v England v Wales) were staged. Richmond (9 times), Streatham (1982) and Peterborough (1985 and 1987) have also staged International matches between England and Scotland.
In 1997 curling stopped at Alexandra Palace and for many years there was nowhere in England to play regularly. Thankfully, in 2004, Ernest Fenton decided to create a dedicated curling rink in Kent, near Tunbridge Wells. Fenton’s Rink is now the home of the South of England Curling Club, the Kent and Sussex Junior Curling Club and the London Curling Club and several other groups who meet there regularly.
Elsewhere in England there is a distinct lack of places to play curling. To hire ice time at one of the 42 ice rinks around the country depends on an organisation’s willingness to pay the highest price for a suitable time slot. Generally, curlers cannot compete with the hundreds of leisure skaters for prime ice times and the management of the rinks are not interested in maintaining the level, smooth and consistent ice surface required for the sport of curling to succeed. Currently the main area of interest is Sheffield where iceSheffield in Attercliffe offer curling to anyone who wants to place a booking, but it has no organised or regular curling sessions.
There have been many plans for further dedicated curling rinks over the years and one which looks like coming on stream soon is the Berkshire Curling Centre near Bracknell which is being developed by Stephen Hinds who has been playing curling for over 30 years.
By comparison, there are around 30 Ice Rinks in Scotland where curling is played with approximately one tenth of the population of England. With this imbalance in facilities compared to population, it is not surprising that Scotland is the dominant force in British Curling and has provided all the players for the Great Britain Olympic Teams! In 2012 ,however, a member of the ECA, Angharad Ward, was selected for the Great Britain Youth Olympic Games squad at the games held in Innsbruck.
Some English curlers outside the London area travel to rinks just over the Scottish border, such as Lockerbie and Kelso, or to Deesside in Wales, and many from all over the country travel to weekend competitions throughout Europe. As well as the clubs mentioned above who play at Fenton’s there are 2 other clubs which are currently active - Preston (who play at Lockerbie) and Glendale in Northumberland (who play at Kelso).
Teams have represented the Association in European Championships (men, women, junior men, junior women and mixed) and World Championships (men, women, junior men, senior men, senior women, mixed doubles and wheelchair). The best results have been bronze medals for the women in the 1976 European Championships and in the 2003 World Senior Women’s Championship. The best results for the men have been 4th in the 1990 European Championships and the 2005 World Senior Championship while the Wheelchair team came 4th in the 2004 World Wheelchair Championships.
In recent years, the addition of a B division in the European Championships has led to further medals, with the women winning a wonderful GOLD medal in 2007. Other medals have been: silver for the men in 2001 and the women in 2002 and bronze for the men in 2000, 2004 and 2011, and for the women in 2000, 2005 and 2006
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)